![]() But unlike other renderers, Vray is still extremely fast in progressive mode I find myself using it in some situations. I've also tested this in other renderers(Cycles4D/Redshift) and likewise, bucket mode has been always faster. I've never seen a case where progressive has been faster than Bucket. Probably the reason behind this speed difference is that for Bucket mode it is easier for Vray to determine the right amount of samples, while for progressive, Vray will add more and more samples adaptively. In my testing I've seen bucket mode being faster by 15% (making sure both renders are as clean) Bucket mode is very good in cleaning noise, so comparing it to progressive you will have to use lower noise threshold, to match how clean it is compared to bucket.ĭifference in speed is scene dependent. ![]() Progressive and bucket produce different noise patterns, so comparing them you shouldn't rely on using the same noise threshold. Bucket mode has been always faster than progressive and it gives you cleaner results with the same noise threshold. There are situations that progressive can be very useful, but for majority of my stills I use bucket mode, here is why Are the consensus, for final renderings stills, Bucket rendering is faster and the way to go?Both of them has advantages and disadvantages.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |